PEV Help please
System
Posts: 100,534 🤖 Admin 🤖
HI
I have been reading the notes on the Dec 06 from the AAT and have found them helpful, however I am stuck on why in the fixed over head variances that for the volume variance you use 0.75p and the other questions you use £3.00! Could any one help me please as I thought I had mastered these but now I am not so sure.
Thank you
Cat12
I have been reading the notes on the Dec 06 from the AAT and have found them helpful, however I am stuck on why in the fixed over head variances that for the volume variance you use 0.75p and the other questions you use £3.00! Could any one help me please as I thought I had mastered these but now I am not so sure.
Thank you
Cat12
0
Comments
-
Re:PEV Help please
Cat1
I used £3.00 in my answer.
But you can find the correct answer using £0.75 as well.
The conventional approach to overhead absorption under standard costing is:
standard cost of overheads for actual production = hrs per unit x rate per hour x units produced
In this case-
the hrs per unit are .025 hrs
-
the rate per hour is £3.00
and-
the units produced are 117,600
As well as this-
the budgeted production of units is 112,000
So you can find the volume variance by saying-
we produced 117,600 -112,000 = 5,600 more units than budgeted
-
Each unit has 0.25 standard hours
-
5,600 units x 0.25 hrs = 1,400 standard hours have been produced more than budget (favourable variance)
-
Each hr we absorb £3.00 of overhead
-
So we have a fixed overhead volume variance which is favourable and worth 1,400 x £3.00 per hour = £4,200
0 -
Re:PEV Help please
But you are just as correct to say:We produced 5,600 more units than budgeted-
Each unit absorbs 0.25 hrs x £3.00 per hr of overhead = £0.75 per unit
-
5,600 x £0.75 = £4,200
Two different sums in one way, but actually the same sum done in a different order.
sandy.hood@chichester.ac.uk
0 -
Re:PEV Help please
That is great it makes it clear now.
Thank you for taking time out of your weekend to help me.
Cat120