What were your thoughts on ECR section 2?

Laura Registered Posts: 5 New contributor 🐸

I took the ECR exam on Dec 3rd for the 1st time, and i was a bit thrown off in section 2 where they had made it more writing orientated than in previous papers! They concentrated more on asking 'what would happen if...' rather than asking people to work things out! I think i might have messed up section 2, as in my revision i was more worried about formulas, and i did a lot of past papers which seemed to have a slightly different format that the paper i actually got!

There was also not a question asking me to work out the payback period and the net present value. These are normally big marks, so i was a bit gutted!

Does anyone else have any thoughts on this?! :001_unsure:


  • sebastianforbes
    sebastianforbes Registered Posts: 172 Dedicated contributor 🦉
    i agree...

    i felt short-changed by fra and ecr !!!
  • natalie
    natalie Registered Posts: 2 New contributor 🐸
    here, here

    I agree as well. i find it a lot easier to do the papers when there asking you to work out an answer rather than just the normal questions like 'please write a reply to.....etc)

    I feel a bit better though that a few other people hated the exam like me though!
Privacy Policy