Home For AAT student members AQ 2013 AAT Level 4 (Level 8 in Scotland)
Current updates regarding coronavirus (Covid-19) and the precautions AAT are taking will be continually updated on the below page.

Please check this link for the latest updates:
We hope you are all safe and well and if you need us we will be here. 💚


PEV J09 Sandy's answer

SandyHoodSandyHood Font Of All KnowledgeRegistered, Moderator Posts: 2,034
If you send me an email with this as the subject:
PEV J09 Sandy's answer

My out of office rule will take a couple of minutes and then reply with an email anmd an excel attachment of what I think the answerrs are.
Sandy
[email protected]
www.sandyhood.com

Comments

  • arleneldarleneld Feels At Home Registered Posts: 56
    Thank you Sandy, your time doing this is greatly appreciated.

    I have made a donation to your named charity.

    Thanks again.
    Arlene
  • carl2687carl2687 Settling In Nicely Registered Posts: 21
    thanks a lot for doing this. i have emailed you altho it hasnt came yet haha.
    hopefully it puts my mind to rest
  • carl2687carl2687 Settling In Nicely Registered Posts: 21
    it came through, and ive looked your answers and i hope all yours are right, because mine look very similar haha. so hopefully mines a pass. a lot more confident now. thanks
  • huehue New Member Registered Posts: 7
    Carl2687 please could you email me the answer for pev as i have seen that you got it from Sandy. I would be sooooooo appreciated... My email address is [email protected]. with many thanks...:001_wub:
  • alicemaylaraalicemaylara Trusted Regular Registered Posts: 259
    Will you be doing answers for any other subjects?
  • lizrochfordlizrochford Feels At Home Registered Posts: 57
    thanks Sandy I have to say its given me lots of confidence most of my answers are the same I mucked up the cost card a bit got the correct figures but I divided them by 10,000 as I misread the question.
  • huehue New Member Registered Posts: 7
    could anyone online please give me the answer for pcr and pev if you have it i would be so grateful thanks millions.......
  • stephdav82stephdav82 New Member Registered Posts: 8
    I have checked my answers against Sandys but I cant see where he gets the cost reduction in 2.3

    I had 600,000 selling and distrib savings
    600,000 from material price as it was 1,200,000 x 50p
    1,200,000 from increase in selling price by £1pound.
    Total savings are £2,400,000

    Sandy has £2,640,000 savings
  • SandyHoodSandyHood Font Of All Knowledge Registered, Moderator Posts: 2,034
    There was also a 10% material usage saving
    Sandy
    [email protected]
    www.sandyhood.com
  • mark130273mark130273 Font Of All Knowledge Registered Posts: 4,234
    SandyHood wrote: »
    There was also a 10% material usage saving

    just sent you an email....

    cheers
    Mark
  • stephdav82stephdav82 New Member Registered Posts: 8
    Thanks Sandy, missed that in the exam.
  • kodakoda Feels At Home Registered Posts: 52
    SandyHood wrote: »
    If you send me an email with this as the subject:
    PEV J09 Sandy's answer

    My out of office rule will take a couple of minutes and then reply with an email anmd an excel attachment of what I think the answerrs are.

    Hi Sandy,

    Will you be doing the same for the PCR exam at all?

    Thanks.
  • po1988po1988 Feels At Home Registered Posts: 39
    the 10% saving doesnt say specifically for material usage does it? it just says it takes up less then 10% of volume and weight of existing?
  • SandyHoodSandyHood Font Of All Knowledge Registered, Moderator Posts: 2,034
    Well read
    I agree with you
    My answer (as I originally wrote it) assumed a % reduction of materials per unit quite wrong and not what the question had said at all as well as the reduction in the price per unit of input.
    I stand corrected and apologise especially to stephdav.

    I will up date my answer shortly

    Thank you all
    Sandy
    [email protected]
    www.sandyhood.com
  • stephdav82stephdav82 New Member Registered Posts: 8
    SandyHood wrote: »
    Well read
    I agree with you
    My answer (as I originally wrote it) assumed a % reduction of materials per unit quite wrong and not what the question had said at all as well as the reduction in the price per unit of input.
    I stand corrected and apologise especially to stephdav.

    I will up date my answer shortly

    Thank you all


    Thanks Sandy, must say it has put my mind at rest as that was the only difference I had with your answers.:001_smile:
Sign In or Register to comment.