June 2007 Task 1.4
JayneHogan
Registered Posts: 697 Epic contributor 🐘
Can anybody tell me why the profit for the period from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent is £4,173 and not £5,042 (£3,886 + £1,156)?
I am so struggling with this topic.
I am so struggling with this topic.
0
Comments
-
Its because wraymand have only bought 75% of the other company, therefore when you consolidate, the only bit of blonks profit attributable to the owners is 75% of their profit which = 867. add this onto wraymands profit of 3886 gives you consolidated profit of 4753, but there is also a dividend paid to wraymand from blonk and this has to be eliminated from the calculation, therefore final profit to owners = 4753 - 580 dividend = 4173 final profit attributable to owners0
-
brilliant! Thank you. I finally understand this topic at the eleventh hour. I have a new job tomorrow and need to revise bank reconciliations from foundation but all I want to do is spend the next two days revising for DFS.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 318 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 156 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 56 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 92 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 272 VAT
- 92 Software
- 274 Tax
- 136 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 201 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 582 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership