PEV 2009 Task 1.3
Julietta100
Registered Posts: 13 New contributor 🐸
Hello I'm completely lost with this one... Looked at the answers and I'm ever more confused... F.ex. in a)The cost per 1,000kg of beans was 1,200 in sept. Seasonal variation was (200) so they are saying that trend would be 1,400... So the negative seasonal variation has been added to the cost?? Why then in b) the negtive seasonal var. has been deducted... Any help would be greatly aprreciated...
P.s. Ahhh that's the PEV December 2009
P.s. Ahhh that's the PEV December 2009
0
Comments
-
In a you are working out the underlying trend, while in b you work from the underlying trend to the actual figures.
Underlying trend plus seasonal variations is actual costs
Actual costs less seasonal variations is underlying trend0 -
Thank you for the reply=) I'm probably being really thick right now but just to make sure...
If calculating underlying trend you add the negative variations and deduct the positives and if calculating the actual figures the other way round?? And yes I do realise how high the level of my ignorance has risen by asking this :P0 -
Seasonal Variations; I suppose it's sort of a bit like selling patio furniture.
During the spring demand would be growing, so there would be a + effect on sales
In the summer demand is high, so there would be a +++ effect on sales.
In the autumn, demand would be waning, so there would be a - (minus) demand for patio furniture.
During the winter, there would demand would be ---(minus) demand for garden furniture.
Patio furniture would be available all year around, it's just that there isn't necessarily always the demand, so this is reflected through the use of seasonal variations.
The demand for Christmas trees would have a completely different seasonal variation, with demand being extremely high from 1 - 24 December, then disappearing completely for the other 48.5 weeks of the year!!!!FMAAT - AAT Licensed Member in Practice - Pewsey, Wiltshire0 -
Julietta100 wrote: »Thank you for the reply=) I'm probably being really thick right now but just to make sure...
If calculating underlying trend you add the negative variations and deduct the positives and if calculating the actual figures the other way round?? And yes I do realise how high the level of my ignorance has risen by asking this
Yes, that's exactly what you do. Don't think you're being ignorant asking something on here, we all ask things that other people know the answers to, that's why this forum worksFMAAT - AAT Licensed Member in Practice - Pewsey, Wiltshire0 -
Ah thank you muchlyyyyyyyyyyyy both of you!! I hope I'll still remember it tomorrow =P0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 324 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 160 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 56 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 94 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 273 VAT
- 92 Software
- 274 Tax
- 138 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 201 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 582 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership