Home For AAT student members AQ 2013 AAT Level 3 (Level 6 in Scotland)
Current updates regarding coronavirus (Covid-19) and the precautions AAT are taking will be continually updated on the below page.

Please check this link for the latest updates:
We hope you are all safe and well and if you need us we will be here. 💚


CRS - Question about answer in practice CBT 1 (apportionment)

SarahJSSarahJS Trusted RegularRegistered Posts: 273
Hi, the question is 1.4

I'm right until the Indirect Labour line.

I've got the basis of apportionment as Allocated (correct) and have added together the indirect staff to 14. When apportioning this ratio 5:2:7 I get different answers to the solutions and have no idea why?! I get 134750 maintenance, 53900 stores and 188650 admin.

If someone could explain why this is wrong (and how I should be doing it) I'd be really greatful :)

Thanks

Comments

  • MarkTMarkT Trusted Regular Registered Posts: 302
    Hi Sarah..

    You're going to kick yourself on this, it is another case of the AAT throwing in the curveball.

    The staff members number is irrelevant. If you look at the figures again, you will see:

    Maintenance 101150
    Stores 36050
    General Admin 240100

    These add up to the 377300 - as it is allocated you do not need to use the ratio - as ratio would equal apportionment

    Hope this makes sense :)
  • SarahJSSarahJS Trusted Regular Registered Posts: 273
    Aaaaah, that's pretty obvious now I've looked back at it. Guess I got a bit too into it! I hate scrolling up and down to see the data.

    Thanks :)
Sign In or Register to comment.