Property Income Wheeze
BIG WAL
Registered Posts: 133 Dedicated contributor 🦉
Happy New Year to all. Can anyone help with property related query ?
A client owns both A Co and B Co. They have very different trades and both trades run at a loss.
But B Co has letting income from residential property, which can’t be offset against the trading loss
and therefore has a CT liability.
So he’s decided that A Co will charge a management fee to B Co for administering the properties.
(Assume it can be backed up with proper paperwork). On that basis, A Co still won’t pay CT because
even after the management fee income, there's still a small loss.
For B Co, the management fee can quite legitimately be offset against the property income– mitigating
tax on the property income.
Sounds like a good wheeze (just like Starbucks) –or is there a catch ?
A client owns both A Co and B Co. They have very different trades and both trades run at a loss.
But B Co has letting income from residential property, which can’t be offset against the trading loss
and therefore has a CT liability.
So he’s decided that A Co will charge a management fee to B Co for administering the properties.
(Assume it can be backed up with proper paperwork). On that basis, A Co still won’t pay CT because
even after the management fee income, there's still a small loss.
For B Co, the management fee can quite legitimately be offset against the property income– mitigating
tax on the property income.
Sounds like a good wheeze (just like Starbucks) –or is there a catch ?
0
Comments
-
Happy New Year to all. Can anyone help with property related query ?
A client owns both A Co and B Co. They have very different trades and both trades run at a loss.
But B Co has letting income from residential property, which can’t be offset against the trading loss
and therefore has a CT liability.
So he’s decided that A Co will charge a management fee to B Co for administering the properties.
(Assume it can be backed up with proper paperwork). On that basis, A Co still won’t pay CT because
even after the management fee income, there's still a small loss.
For B Co, the management fee can quite legitimately be offset against the property income– mitigating
tax on the property income.
Sounds like a good wheeze (just like Starbucks) –or is there a catch ?
I would have thought that this transaction would have to be disclosed in both sets of accounts as a related party transaction and that HMRC could challenge the valuation of the transaction, i.e. argue that the valuation of the management fee is too high.0 -
Thanks - I hadn't thought of that. I'll make sure it's disclosed in both accounts, and client is advised that while it worksfor tax, there's a risk of it being challenged.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 328 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 161 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 57 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 95 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.9K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 273 VAT
- 92 Software
- 275 Tax
- 138 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 203 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 584 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership