Contra charges imposed by customer
jamesm96
Registered Posts: 523
Hi everyone,
Anyone on here have much experience with commercial / contract law issues?
The long-and-the-short of it is that I have a client who fits commercial window blinds. They have been chasing a customer (a contractor) for money for some while, and that contractor has now replied by listing out all sorts of counter-charges, which exceed the value of the invoices that my client was chasing.
Some of the charges are valid. However some are unreasonable. e.g. where my client was asked (at the last minute) to fit more blinds than had been agreed in a day, resulting in not having enough time to do a site clean-up, and the contractor is retrospectively charging them for clean-up costs. Also the contractor had mis-ordered some blinds and therefore had to re-order (my client did not supply any blinds), but they are now charging for delivery of the replacement blinds, and penalties where jobs overran because of delays caused by awaiting replacement blinds.
Additionally, I'm not aware that there were any contracts in place (and therefore no formal agreement as regards penalties... etc).
How enforceable are such fees?
Cheers all,
Mike.
Anyone on here have much experience with commercial / contract law issues?
The long-and-the-short of it is that I have a client who fits commercial window blinds. They have been chasing a customer (a contractor) for money for some while, and that contractor has now replied by listing out all sorts of counter-charges, which exceed the value of the invoices that my client was chasing.
Some of the charges are valid. However some are unreasonable. e.g. where my client was asked (at the last minute) to fit more blinds than had been agreed in a day, resulting in not having enough time to do a site clean-up, and the contractor is retrospectively charging them for clean-up costs. Also the contractor had mis-ordered some blinds and therefore had to re-order (my client did not supply any blinds), but they are now charging for delivery of the replacement blinds, and penalties where jobs overran because of delays caused by awaiting replacement blinds.
Additionally, I'm not aware that there were any contracts in place (and therefore no formal agreement as regards penalties... etc).
How enforceable are such fees?
Cheers all,
Mike.
0
Comments
-
It is a general principle in building contract law that you must first give the supplier the opportunity to correct his work before engaging others to do it, therefore in my opinion these contra charges would not be valid.
These tactics are commonplace in construction, whereby the contractor and main client would have a contract which outlined penalties if the job was late and if they suffer then they look to the subbies to get their money back.
With regard to the contract issue surely he had an order or how else did he get the job?
I would issue proceedings through the small claims procedure.(and don't ever work for main contractors again!)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 322 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 159 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 56 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 93 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 273 VAT
- 92 Software
- 274 Tax
- 138 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 201 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 582 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership