Labour ratios
System
Posts: 100,534 🤖 Admin 🤖
Does anyone know a good way to remember the formulae for labour ratios?
0
Comments
-
Re:Labour ratios
Hi
Could you be more specific about which labour ratios
Eva
0 -
Re:Labour ratios
Labour capacity, Labour efficiency and Labour expenditure.0 -
Re:Labour ratios
We did this last night at college
S A S Special Army Services
- - -
B B A Best British Army
V C E Very Clever Edward (Our Tutor)
S = Standard Hrs
A = Actual Hrs
B = Budgeted Hrs
V = Volume = SH/Bh
C = Capacity = AH/BH
E = Efficiency = SH/AH
Remember this and write it down in the exam you can refer to it when needed.
Hoep this helps
Jackie
0 -
Re:Labour ratios
Hi,
I found the following really useful and easy to remember the "PURE AS" (or "Pure as as" as it reads) method for materials and labour: -
Price (material) standard - actual x Actual
Useage (material) standard - actual x Standard
Rate (labour) standard - actual x Actual
Efficiency (labour) standard - actual x Standard
and for Overhead variances : -
ABC (the alphabet) Actual - Budget x absorb rate = Capacity
SAE (Stamped addressed envelope) Standard - Actual x absorp rate = Efficiency
SBV (Silly bloody variances) Standard - Budget x absorb rate = Volume
I find silly rhymes for things like these make them easier to remember.
Hope this helps you too!!!
Eva
0 -
Re:Labour ratios
Thanks Eva0 -
Re:Labour ratios
And thanks Jackie0 -
Re:Labour ratios
Before you answer a question
STOP AND THINK
Then
If the Standard hours produced are more than the Budgeted hours you can expect a ratio of more than 1 (or over 100%) for the VOLUME
If the Actual hours worked are more than the Budgeted hours you can expect a ratio of more than 1 (or over 100%) for the CAPACITY
If the Standard hours produced are more than the Actual hours you can expect a ratio of more than 1 (or over 100%) for the EFFICIENCY
If you've seen my postings you'll see I am far more interested in understanding what is going on than learning formulae0 -
Re:Labour ratios
Thanks for your help Sandy, I find it much more easy to understand looking at it that way rather than looking at formulae0