i really dont know why they tried to replace the great christopher reeve!!
Well, seeing as they had $200m to burn on something and remaking Superman was chosen, maybe a severe case of death might have prevented Mr Reeve from reprising his role? But it was ****.
0
blobbyhFont Of All KnowledgeRegisteredPosts: 2,415
**** me, the swear filters are back up and running!
0
mark130273Font Of All KnowledgeRegisteredPosts: 4,234
i thought that they would of really made a good effort not to try and make it a stinker.....but compaired to the first 3 films it was awful...mind you i didnt think the very first superman film was any good !
Comments
sorry i got them mixed up.........what happened in 4 then ?
So was the $200m+ remake "Superman Returns" from a few years ago that added absolutely nothing to the superior Christopher Reeve movies.
i really dont know why they tried to replace the great christopher reeve!!
Well, seeing as they had $200m to burn on something and remaking Superman was chosen, maybe a severe case of death might have prevented Mr Reeve from reprising his role? But it was ****.
OMG the most annoying man in film
you can not be serious......he is an acting GOD !!
Cant stand him
love him .......he brilliant............
mind you i must say he is a actor which you either love him or hates ...hes never an inbetweener !