Treatment of rent deposits at year end
Shirl
Registered Posts: 4 New contributor 🐸
We have rented a flat in Ireland for the duration of a current work contract. Rent has been paid in advance and we have dealt with this as a prepayment. What about the deposit which was paid initially, do we treat that as a prepayment assuming that the amount is re-imbursed in full or do we leave in last years accounts as there is no guarantee of the deposit being refunded.
Any help appreciated.
Shirl
Any help appreciated.
Shirl
0
Comments
-
Ordinarily you would treat the deposit as a sundry debtor as the landlord will refund this, assuming no damage etc.
So:
Initial recognition of the deposit:
CR bank/cash
DR sundry debtors
When landlord refunds:
DR bank/cash
CR sundry debtors.
Regards
Steve0 -
I have always treated deposits held as current liabilities.0
-
It's a debtor!0
-
deanshepherd wrote: »It's a debtor!
Deposits held?0 -
Just 'sundry debtors' would do.
It's a debtor because it's owed back to you.
It can't be a liability because it's not something you owe, you have already paid it and, unless you trash the place, you will get it back
The deposit received from a tenant will be a liability in the books of the landlord.0 -
Just 'sundry debtors' would do.
It's a debtor because it's owed back to you.
It can't be a liability because it's not something you owe, you have already paid it and, unless you trash the place, you will get it back
The deposit received from a tenant will be a liability in the books of the landlord.
This is getting confusing....
My previous reply was to TC, who was talking about deposits held.
So, if you class a deposit held by the other party as a sundry debtors, why wouldn't you class a deposit held by yourself as a sundry creditor?0 -
Yes, I am talking as a landlord holding a deposit for a property. The money held is a liability, as it will be repaid at the end of the tenancy, or a journal entry made from deposits held to income received if the deposit is kept for damage at the end of the tenancy. Hope that makes sense.0
-
The OP asked from the point of view of the tenant. That was the point of view of my answer. Sorry for any confusion!0
