AAT Marking scheme

System
System Posts: 100,534 🤖 Admin 🤖
edited June 18 in AAT student discussion
Hello all,<BR><BR>sat the BTC and DFS exams and just glad its over for now. Why is it you can get the answers near perfect at home yet in the exam room the mind just does crazy things!!<BR><BR>I still dont understand how they AAT mark our papers, im concerned esp on BTC as i made silly mistakes like apportioning the balancing adjustments on question 1.1 and indexed the enhancement expenditure in question 1.3 which was acquired after apr'1998. so i know my final answers were wrong but in my workings i wrote loads of theory stuff so will i get any marks for that?? for example on question 1.1 in BTC i wrote in my notes that no WDA was to be calculated as the co was ceasing trade and therefore balancing adjustments needed to be made. <BR><BR>So would the AAT give me marks for my knowledge despite putting in incorrect figures? could someone please give me any information regarding this please.

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 100,534 🤖 Admin 🤖
    AAT Marking scheme

    Hi<BR><BR>Yeah the AAT marking scheme is a bit odd because it is NVQ based. The idea with NVQs is that you show a good level of competence across the entire syllabus.<BR><BR>Generally speaking, you should get marks for anything you got right, providing what you put was relevant of course. If you got figures wrong but (e.g.) your formulas was correct, you should still get soemthing, I believe.<BR><BR>Neil

Categories

Privacy Policy