signwriting on motor vehicles
Poodle
Registered Posts: 711 Epic contributor ๐
Hi
I have always written off the cost of signwriting of motor vehicles in the year that the cost was incurred.
I recently read an article in 'Taxation' suggesting that this should be capitalised as it enhances the value of an asset.
Any comments would be appreciated
Poodle
I have always written off the cost of signwriting of motor vehicles in the year that the cost was incurred.
I recently read an article in 'Taxation' suggesting that this should be capitalised as it enhances the value of an asset.
Any comments would be appreciated
Poodle
0
Comments
-
I've always written off as advertising, especially as usually the cost is below our capitalisation limit!
I wouldn't say that it enhances the asset but would be interested in what others think.0 -
Revenue expense - advertising.
It's not enhancing the asset, it's utilising the asset for advertising purposes.0 -
I recently had this at work with three of our vans and i put it to advertising expense but our auditors said that it was a capital transaction. When i asked why they said it was because we had the writing done when we bought them the signwriting were additional transactions bringing the vans into the use which my company intends. They never said anything about enhancing the vans.
Carrie0 -
cornflower wrote: ยปI recently had this at work with three of our vans and i put it to advertising expense but our auditors said that it was a capital transaction. When i asked why they said it was because we had the writing done when we bought them the signwriting were additional transactions bringing the vans into the use which my company intends. They never said anything about enhancing the vans.
Carrie
We do the same at my work process as a capital transaction, our auditors said the same to me.0 -
Ahh but do you have a minimum capitalisation limit? Quite often signwriting comes under that limit so is written off within the year0
-
Our company does not capitalise anything under ยฃ150 but we had three vans written which cost ยฃ900 + VAT. i always thought advertising was expense accounts so put it there but when the auditors came in they had moved it into motor vehicle additions and said that it was fixed assets not advertising.
I was confused by it all.:laugh:0 -
Hi
I have Just been doing some research on this and I think that I have come to the conclusion that it should be capitalised. BIM 42550 covers advertising and states:
"Ordinary current expenditure on advertising the trader's goods or services (for example, on newspaper advertisements, distribution of free samples of the goods dealt in) is allowable.
Where the expenditure is on the erection of permanent hoardings or other apparatus of a durable nature, it is disallowable as capital expenditure."
I hear what you say Bluewednesday and I ask myself "does it realy matter now with the AIA?" not many of my SME's have ยฃ50k to invest on plant in a year and so even if capialised they will be able to claim full relief anyway now.
Poodle0 -
My new boss is a qualified accountant (CIMA) and she said that anything like this should be capitalised. i still do not quite follow it because i thought all advertising was expense but not to worry.
Carrie.:glare:0 -
Hi,
The question of signwriting on vans has always prompted the 'capital vs. revenue' question and I can try to explain the logic why your auditors move such expenditure from revenue to capital. The reasons also interlink with tax legislation and GAAP.
If you look at FRS 15 or the FRSSE paragraphs then the 'cost' of an asset is determined by its actual cost price plus incidental costs of acquisition. Incidental costs of acquisition are also mentioned in Sch 8 of the Companies Act 1985 for small companies which states that such 'incidental costs' are all costs that are directly attributable in getting the asset ready for its intended use. In the case of van(s) signwriting such expenditure (subject to the company's 'de minimis' level for capital expenditure) can be classed as such and written off over the life of the asset.
Kind regards
Steve0 -
Bluewednesday wrote: ยปAhh but do you have a minimum capitalisation limit? Quite often signwriting comes under that limit so is written off within the year
Unless you include it as part of the whole vehicle cost?
I suppose you could get away with doing it either way. As you could argue the asset would be used regardless of signwriting, which is advertising...0 -
If you look at FRS 15 or the FRSSE paragraphs then the 'cost' of an asset is determined by its actual cost price plus incidental costs of acquisition. Incidental costs of acquisition are also mentioned in Sch 8 of the Companies Act 1985 for small companies which states that such 'incidental costs' are all costs that are directly attributable in getting the asset ready for its intended use.
Steve,
So does this mean that the first tank of fuel, first payment of road fund license and first years insurance premiums should also be capitlised?:001_smile:
Poodle0 -
Actually Poodle, you would be surprised as to the number of times I've been asked such questions (I know you are being tongue in cheek and it isn't a serious question!!) but I do have an aswer to it!! I've also very recently been asked why employees cannot be capitalised (this was actually a guy who runs his own company but passed intermediate AAT) but I thought I would jot the answers down and with the employee scenario put a smile on your faces.
The answer to the fuel etc (as you will know) is that they are general overhead and running costs, which cannot be capitalised.
A client that said all employees should be capitalised based his facts on FRS 15 in that:
"an asset is a resource controlled by the entity (he said he was the boss!!) as a result of past events (he said this was the job offer) and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity (he said without staff the company would fail). Pretty naive bases for capitalisation if you ask me.
A. You can't measure the true worth of a person - so that fails on the 'measurement' criteria - plus how would you "depreciate" the employees; and
B. You don't actually control the individual - the individual can choose to leave the employment if s/he so wishes so any "depreciation" in (a) above would be a "stab in the dark".
The joys of the "capital vs. revenue" debate!!
Steve0 -
I think the distinction is whether the signs were written before the vans were brought into use, in which case I can understand the auditors comments (expenditure making new equip ready for use is capitalised, generally - apart from that tank of fuel )
If the van is in use and then gets signwritten separately, I'd stick with Advertising.0 -
Interested in your reply for capitalising people Steve but you can capitalise some employees can't you, for example a footballer or other athlete?
They have an asset price aka transfer fee, can be depreciated over their useful life e.g. ten or so years, can return economic benefits, you have them under your control via a purchase agreement (signed contract) and can be disposed of (as some most certainly should be!). This came up in a workplace discussion a few weeks ago and we found some rules regarding sporting businesses but it's Friday evening and I'm too tired to look for them again now!0 -
I think you amortise the cost of their contract over it's life as opposed to the people themselves0
-
Yes, Annette is correct - it is the actual footballer's contract that is capitalised and amortised over its life - the contract being measured by virtue of the transfer price. The actual footballer (i.e. the human being) is not capitalised as you cannot place a value on a human being (even though sometimes people do!!!:ohmy:)
The footballer himself (or as is the case these days, herself) is paid a wage/salary which is, of course, expensed. The client I cited wanted to capitalise wages for some bizarre reason!
Kind regards
Steve0 -
Even reading my DFS books makes ifrs 15 complicated:huh:
hope I don't get a question like this in my deecember exam0 -
cornflower wrote: ยปEven reading my DFS books makes ifrs 15 complicated
Do you not mean IAS 16?
Regards
Steve0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 325 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 160 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 56 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 95 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 273 VAT
- 92 Software
- 274 Tax
- 138 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 202 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 582 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership