Issue with training provider

I have an issue with the training provider I choose for the basic bookkeeping course.

The company’s material that I have accessed is inconsistent. When I raised this issue with them and asked for my money back, I received a torrent of insults. I don’t consider myself rude, for raising an issue. I just wanted help to sort it, or my money back. Neither route has been offered.

I don’t want to continue ‘learning’ with this provider. However, I didn’t raise this issue within the first 7 days of joining the course as my mother was in hospital (we thought that she was dying).

To further complicate this issue, I didn’t actually have full access to the course, until I complained 3 weeks after signing up. By this time we knew that my mum would live and I had accessed the course.

How can a tracning provider let their side of the contract down by not organising complete access, but expect me to still abide by it.

The person I was communicating with is dismissive to my issues now. I can’t believe the level of customer service compared to other companies that bend over backwards to help customers who have problems.

How can I get my money back for my course?

So I can go to another provider.

Thanks for any advice.

Leanda Morrison

Not registered?

Register to create your free account, talk to AAT members and start your own discussions.

Comments

  • CSan89
    CSan89 Registered Posts: 207
    Which training provider is it?

    You could look to see if they have been approved by AAT because if they are then you could put a complaint in with them.

    A 7 day cooling off period seems very short but sadly there are a lot of cowboy training providers out there, especially with online courses.
    AAT Level 2&3 - 2016
    AAT Level 4 - 2017
    Personal Tax, Business Tax and External Auditing

    ACA/CTA -
    Certificate Level - Jan 2019
  • reader
    reader Registered Posts: 1,037 Beyond epic contributor 🧙‍♂️
    Leave a negative review about them on google

    And contact citizens advice/trading standards
  • Leandajm
    Leandajm Registered Posts: 3
    CSan89 said:

    Which training provider is it?

    You could look to see if they have been approved by AAT because if they are then you could put a complaint in with them.

    A 7 day cooling off period seems very short but sadly there are a lot of cowboy training providers out there, especially with online courses.

    AAT suggested these guys. I choose the wrong one out of two suggestions!! They have no Google review, so this should have concerned me. I'm not going to say who they are, as I would be as unprofessional as they have been and I have standards.
    reader said:

    Leave a negative review about them on google

    And contact citizens advice/trading standards

    They don't have a Google review. They have a strange business model that sponges good quality material from another provider (Kaplan) but then provides dreadful 'supporting' material.

    Thanks for your suggestions. I'll contact AAT first, then try citizens advice/ trading standards.
  • NeilH
    NeilH Registered Posts: 553 Epic contributor 🐘
    edited April 2018
    Hi

    A lot of training providers do use other provider materials (particularly Kaplan and BPP materials, why not name and shame them on here?! ;)

    When you say that the AAT "suggested" them, was it a specific suggestion or were they part of the approved providers list? Either way, make a complaint to the AAT.
  • reader
    reader Registered Posts: 1,037 Beyond epic contributor 🧙‍♂️
    You could search for the training provider using the companies house website and write to the director's personally if their contact details are there: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/
  • Leandajm
    Leandajm Registered Posts: 3
    edited April 2018
    reader said:

    You could search for the training provider using the companies house website and write to the director's personally if their contact details are there: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/

    It looks like it was the company director who was the abusive one. A very strange company that supposedly never has any complaints, but then again doesn't address complaints well at all.

Not registered?

Register to create your free account, talk to AAT members and start your own discussions.
Privacy Policy