Copies of Passports

Hi
An issue has come up at the practice I work at where someone heard that we aren't allowed to keep copies of passports because they can be used to create a phony passport. I'm not sure how true this is but can someone advise? Obviously passports are an awesome of finding out if someone is who they say they are etc... Has anyone else heard anything similar to this?
advice?
An issue has come up at the practice I work at where someone heard that we aren't allowed to keep copies of passports because they can be used to create a phony passport. I'm not sure how true this is but can someone advise? Obviously passports are an awesome of finding out if someone is who they say they are etc... Has anyone else heard anything similar to this?
advice?
0
Comments
We do copies of passports here and not had a problem as long as the clients books and records are secure
In theory I wouldn't of thought so as long as it is kept secure, the subject can access it, it is only kept for as long as needed etc etc.
The client has said that a copy of passport can be used to file a false passport replacement form. She knew someone who objected to a copy of the passport being kept for this reason, went to a unknown union and they agreed with her...
You need photo id and what id they dont drive? what else could you use and if they couldnt produce anything else should you even take on the client? Money Laundering states you need full id
Personally I make all my staff give DNA samples and allow me to photograph all identifiable birth marks, tatoos and piercings.
I tell them it's the law.........they don't understand...... no one speaks English.................
i was speaking as in client id and proceedure not employment i.e 64-8 LOE ect
never working for you not if you have to take photo of my birthmark lol (please dont ask where) lol
(I really need to find out more about that birthmark)
Oh go on, tell us!!
Passport copy (or photo driving license) is an essential piece of information to obtain from the client and keep as part of the money laurndering checks
yep as i though
lol i sit on the best part of it nuff said
lol i know how to kill a good thread lmao hahaha
NOW im intrieged ????
Mark you know how you like to finish a thread well i am with NUFF SAID lmao
But yeah, copying client ID is an big part of client ID and money laundering checks!
I thought that the reason we take copies of passports is so that if the client was ever suspected of criminal activity the police could come to us for details of the client's identity. I would think that a full copy of a passport would be more useful to the police than one with parts blanked out, but I stand to be corrected.
Most employers take a copy of passport on employing you and do keep it on file as a form of ID it also confirms you are legally aloud to work in the UK.
Never heard of that one before. We check ID to confirm the client is who they say they are. Once we have confirmed it there is no reason to keep a copy other than to prove we have carried out the MLR assessment. If the client would rather we did not keep a copy then blanking out the particulars seems a very good idea. No client has raised any objections to me so far.
My understanding regarding new customer due diligence is that it is not necessary to take photocopies of the evidence used as ID, just keeping a note is sufficient so that it may be traced e.g. passport number and date of issue.
The fact that photocopies are being taken is probably down to the practices own procedures and their setting levels for risk.
Personally, I do not have a passport and I do not have a photo driving license and so would you turn me down as a client?
Julia
We agree that checking eligibility to work is a legal requirement for an employer however physically keeping a copy of the person's passport once this has been done is arguably in breach of the following parts of the Data Protection Act;
"... processed for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and not further processed in any way that is incompatible with the original purpose".
"... kept for no longer than is necessary for the purpose for which it is being used".
"... adequate, relevant and not excessive".
"... accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date".
I'd say keeping copies on file, including those of ex-employees, breaks all four of the above principles not to mention the others if data is not stored securely.
Pretty easy to say after the fact when you're up against the wall but while keeping copies of documentation may have arguably proved her innocence, the offence was for employing an illegal immigrant not for failing to take copies.
From Wikipedia:
"The housekeeper's passport, seized by the UK Borders Agency contained a forged visa, but even the forged visa had expired at the date Baroness Scotland claimed to have inspected it. Baroness Scotland has since suggested that there must have been a second passport, so far undiscovered, and that this was the passport she inspected, but failed to copy".