Pev 09 - ??
Comments
-
donnaalwill wrote: »Ahh yes I forgot about the standards, I wrote that the 1000 was too high as an ideal standard and the 600 was too low and then waffled on in the meantime about ideal and basic standards and why they wouldn't be good to use in practise.
LOL same here!! waffling was not the word for it!!! I Ranted!!0 -
Working next 2 days
I have to work next 2 days and pcr I found really hard and too much writing on it that is my weakness I seem to figure out the number but can not express in writing because English is not my lang. I 'm worrying now and not sure about written part on pve either0 -
Did it say anywhere in the paper that the percentages had to be to 1 decimal place as i think i rounded all of mine do you recon they will penolise me for this
0 -
What was the standard they were referring to in the question after the index numbers i didn't have a clue
It was the ideal standard, where they expect the best quality material for cheapest price, no machine breakdown most units possible produced, and it reduces staff moral as standards and targets are never met!!!
Then the 600 bit i wrote that if this was the standard set staff would start to get slack as they know the standards are easy to acheive, if the standard was risen in the next month or year it would be difficult to pick it up again after standards were so low?!?!?!0 -
Harriet1411 wrote: »It was the ideal standard, where they expect the best quality material for cheapest price, no machine breakdown most units possible produced, and it reduces staff moral as standards and targets are never met!!!
Then the 600 bit i wrote that if this was the standard set staff would start to get slack as they know the standards are easy to acheive, if the standard was risen in the next month or year it would be difficult to pick it up again after standards were so low?!?!?!
sounds good to me!!0 -
Harriet1411 wrote: »It was the ideal standard, where they expect the best quality material for cheapest price, no machine breakdown most units possible produced, and it reduces staff moral as standards and targets are never met!!!
Then the 600 bit i wrote that if this was the standard set staff would start to get slack as they know the standards are easy to acheive, if the standard was risen in the next month or year it would be difficult to pick it up again after standards were so low?!?!?!
yeah thats what i got0 -
I'm in work tomorrow (first time since last Tuesday) and then off Wednesday and Thursday. Its going to be a reality shock when I go back to work next week properly!!
I don't remember seeing anything about specific decimal places, I think I rounded mine to two places.0 -
rachelrunshaw wrote: »You're not in work over the next 2 days are you?
Got a few days off to revise havent really done much revision on PCR yet hopefully that will change when i pull my finger out.0 -
I'm kicking myself because I ran out of time and I couldnt remember the name of the standard although I knew it. It came to me as he said put your pens down. I put the perfect standard (stupid I know!!) but I though it will come to me in a min and then I will cross it out0
-
donnaalwill wrote: »I'm in work tomorrow (first time since last Tuesday) and then off Wednesday and Thursday. Its going to be a reality shock when I go back to work next week properly!!
I don't remember seeing anything about specific decimal places, I think I rounded mine to two places.
I did check and didn't see anything about how many decimal places they had to be to, fingers crossed0 -
Got a few days off to revise havent really done much revision on PCR yet hopefully that will change when i pull my finger out.
I'm off now to start PCR as I've not done any revision for this unit and out of the two, this is my least favourite. I just cannot be bothered though. Good luck for Thursday and see you next Monday.
Rachel0 -
haha just realised its you rachel wen you said monday i was like how are you guna see me on monday i dont even know you, but then again i do know you.0
-
Does any one know when they will post the exam paper on the website so we can check the answers. Am scared now as people seem to be getting differant variance amounts!!!!0
-
No idea. It seems to be guesswork so far? I can't remember when they post the dates that we get results/they put the papers up etc. I think its odd they aren't up already actually!0
-
katie123666 wrote: »Does any one know when they will post the exam paper on the website so we can check the answers. Am scared now as people seem to be getting differant variance amounts!!!!
think its when the results come out so students dont check their answers and panic!0 -
They usually put the question paper up before the results come out, and then the answers are put up just after the results come out I think. When they put the paper up it means we can have another look to see how we think we did. Can't be confirmed until the actual results are shown though as we have no idea of the pass rates etc!0
-
Thanks for the info0
-
Was that Crawley??Yeh past paper answers do vary, i always think i do overkill but i suppose its better to have more rather than not enough.
A girl turned up late in mine and then left after an hour-ish theres know way she could have done it all in an hour. Her mobile went off aswell during exam.
Don't suppose that was Crawley???0 -
£575 was correct for the reconciliation statement was it not as it said reconcile the direct materials/costs?0
-
i agree i got the same as well!!!The Master wrote: »i got 800a
2250f
600f
1875a
550f
150a
#I agree, I got the same0 -
I feel that todays exam was asking for way to much to be done with the amount of time given. 2.2A i know i got my calculations wrong due to pressure and I missed out task 2.2 B (calculate more ratios) and C (another report)! depressing..0
-
The Master wrote: »Thats the big thing that was dofferent with section 1 - they were after the rconcilliation between the actual cost of MATERIALS ONLY and the budgeted cost of MATERIALS ONLY. The reconcilliation had nothing to do with the overhead variances - sneaky if you ask me
Yeah, but rather easy to figure out if you don't calculate overhead variances until 1.4
0 -
katie123666 wrote: »Which Coffee machine option did anybody pick?
I like the Koffio machine. But I also like the Supremio machine. There's only one way to decide. FIGHT!!!!!!0 -
Oh Dear, think I have failed miserably!!!!
I never seem to be able to retain the information for PEV, no matter how hard I try.
My answers were a load of twaddle!!!! Resit here I come! 0 -
PEV Exam Results
Does anyone know the date of the results?0 -
16th Feb.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.5K For AAT students
- 323 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 160 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 56 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 93 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 273 VAT
- 92 Software
- 274 Tax
- 138 Bookkeeping
- 7.2K General accounting discussion
- 201 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 582 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership