MAC - June 2010
Options
A-Vic
Registered Posts: 6,970 Beyond epic contributor 🧙♂️
When can we discuss???
0
Comments
-
Do you think you did OK?FMAAT - AAT Licensed Member in Practice - Pewsey, Wiltshire0
-
i think i did0
-
Do you think you did OK?
think i done better than last time but dont like to think about it too much as normally if i think i do bad i pass and if i think i done good i fail. but i did start thinking i was going to need more paper as i was writing so much. and was making a major effort to write every working as i think that not showing enough is my downfall in the past0 -
roll on 3pm0
-
because of the different time zones people may still be sitting the exam or waiting to sit the exam0
-
half an hour to go !!! wowww section 1 was happy happy section 2 was lengthy lengthy0
-
Hmmmm........ hard to gauge how well i did it was slightly different to what iwould have expected0
-
is it three yet?0
-
overall i don't think the questions were that difficult but the volume of stuff they wanted was a bit overwhelming. i think it was definately a quantity vs quality paper and half the stuff learnt was useless. Don't know about this one, i'm just bricking it about BTC tomorrow
0 -
i remember enegery i got 2.5 variable per unit and 30,000 fixed cost (i really hope you can post) lol
What threw me was section two and them dam ratio's
Am i the only one that thought this was a very short paper and wonder how it will be scored i mean as in question amounts i was writing up untill 5 mins till the end, deffo no easy marks to score0 -
section 1 was fairly ok Section 2 was bit lengthy in a real hurry i made some mistakes on ratios0
-
i remember enegery i got 2.5 variable per unit and 30,000 fixed cost (i really hope you can post) lol
What threw me was section two and them dam ratio's
Am i the only one that thought this was a very short paper and wonder how it will be scored i mean as in question amounts i was writing up untill 5 mins till the end
same here i got 2.5 as well on energy0 -
i remember enegery i got 2.5 variable per unit and 30,000 fixed cost (i really hope you can post) lol
What threw me was section two and them dam ratio's
Am i the only one that thought this was a very short paper and wonder how it will be scored i mean as in question amounts i was writing up untill 5 mins till the end
i didnt know what to do with the energy, hope haven't lost too much. i took 2 1/2 hours which i didnt think was too bad.0 -
overall i don't think the questions were that difficult but the volume of stuff they wanted was a bit overwhelming. i think it was definately a quantity vs quality paper and half the stuff learnt was useless. Don't know about this one, i'm just bricking it about BTC tomorrow
so am i0 -
on ratios question i took actual units for only 1st ratio and for the next 2 ratios i took budgeted units because i wasnt sure which one to take0
-
hope the last question didnt count for too much - i really messed that up. didnt know 3 of the ratios, and panicked over gross margin ! so used one calculation for gross margin percentage but then another for the amended gross margin figure
think i got the rest of the paper spot on though so hoping i should be ok0 -
I though it wasa nice paper but loads of writting my hand is killing. lol0
-
Me too feel like ive spent far to much time on mac0
-
umerali2003 wrote: »on ratios question i took actual units for only 1st ratio and for the next 2 ratios i took budgeted units because i wasnt sure which one to take
oh god ........i did the other way - used actuals for most of the ratios i think????0 -
the last question on section 2 was pain in the neck . i only managed 20 mintues for the question0
-
Thought most of it was fine, bit confused by the RONA and the stock questions at the end. Did other people treat the materials in the first question as one 4X4 square per unit even though there was waste?0
-
umerali2003 wrote: »on ratios question i took actual units for only 1st ratio and for the next 2 ratios i took budgeted units because i wasnt sure which one to take
i got confused by that too0 -
sassyduell wrote: »Thought most of it was fine, bit confused by the RONA and the stock questions at the end. Did other people treat the materials in the first question as one 4X4 square per unit even though there was waste?
i did as it said it had no value.0 -
sassyduell wrote: »Thought most of it was fine, bit confused by the RONA and the stock questions at the end. Did other people treat the materials in the first question as one 4X4 square per unit even though there was waste?
yeah i did0 -
i did it off the 16 and ignored the 12 and the waste had no value0
-
because it said actual sales per unit for the 1st one only as far as my thinking goes0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.2K Books to buy and sell
- 2.3K General discussion
- 12.4K For AAT students
- 283 NEW! Qualifications 2022
- 150 General Qualifications 2022 discussion
- 11 AAT Level 2 Certificate in Accounting
- 50 AAT Level 3 Diploma in Accounting
- 71 AAT Level 4 Diploma in Professional Accounting
- 8.8K For accounting professionals
- 23 coronavirus (Covid-19)
- 270 VAT
- 92 Software
- 271 Tax
- 135 Bookkeeping
- 7.1K General accounting discussion
- 198 AAT member discussion
- 3.8K For everyone
- 38 AAT news and announcements
- 345 Feedback for AAT
- 2.8K Chat and off-topic discussion
- 580 Job postings
- 16 Who can benefit from AAT?
- 36 Where can AAT take me?
- 42 Getting started with AAT
- 26 Finding an AAT training provider
- 48 Distance learning and other ways to study AAT
- 25 Apprenticeships
- 66 AAT membership